First Name: | Robert |
---|---|
Last Name: | Knight |
Email Address: | rknight@bki.com |
Affiliation | Bevilacqua-Knight, Inc. (BKi) |
Subject | Green Buildings and Energy Efficiency |
Comment |
The aspect of "green building" that is of greatest relevance to AB32's goals is the reliably long-term minimization of energy use in the building. Energy use in California buildings is about evenly divided between residential and commercial buildings, with each around 20% of the state's total. Reducing that consumption is a crucial aspect of an effective AB32 strategy. Particularly in the residential sector, traditional construction, remodeling, and repairs tend to be undertaken without adequate consideration of the building's design and operation as an integrated system. The design or modification of one component, such as the insulation, can have unanticipated effects on other components, such as the optimal sizing of the space conditioning equipment...with long-term consequences for energy efficiency and consumption in addition to comfort, health, safety, and the building's operating costs and value. We therefore suggest that AB32 should support the widespread use of "whole-building" approaches to assure maximum long-term energy savings in construction, remodeling, and major repairs. This recommendation is included in the recent California Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan. This approach goes well beyond the latest version of the state's Title 24 energy code and can deliver far deeper reliable energy savings per home than any conventional approach. It is embodied in the federal "Home Performance with Energy Star" program sponsored by DOE and EPA but is still small both nationally and in California. In this state, initial implementation programs are delivered primarily through the California Building Performance Contractors Association (an Energy Star Partner) and are being sponsored by the major electric and gas utilities. In coming years, greater emphasis on such innovative efficiency program strategies will be needed but are currently hampered by the CPUC's narrow interpretation of cost-effectiveness. Greater recognition of the full range of benefits will be essential. |
Attachment |
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-06-26 16:12:35 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.