First Name: | Carolyn |
---|---|
Last Name: | Chase |
Email Address: | cdchase@movesandiego.org |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Cap & Trade details / 2020 vs. 2050 Focus |
Comment |
Move San Diego is a non-profit organization working to create convenient, on-time, healthy, sustainable transportation throughout the San Diego region. Currently, our major focus is working with business, environmental, and government interests to create a transit system which is competitive in every way with private automobiles, and to reform land use planning to emphasize compact development conducive to transit, bicycling and walking. Move San Diego has reviewed the Climate Change Draft Scoping Plan and are pleased to submit the following comments. First, we are pleased to see that the Air Resources Board takes very seriously the ambitious timelines laid out in AB 32. It appears regulations and programs will be in place in a timely manner as prescribed by the law. We also commend ARB for due consideration of co-benefits of GHG regulation and the need to avoid disproportionately large impacts on underrepresented populations. The Cap and Trade Approach We agree with the document’s basic framework, which entails the creation of a new cap and trade system for GHG, managed in cooperation with the other state members of the Western Climate Initiative. This seems the most sensible approach. We urge you to consider every aspect of the launch of the cap and trade system, such that polluters do not receive windfall profits, at the expense of consumers, and that any revenues from the system be used in part to reduce the costs to members of the public most disadvantaged by increased prices that may result from regulation. This can best be accomplished by auctioning allowances or credits, and distributing these revenues to low income groups via public transit enhancements, needs-based rebates on high-efficiency appliances, etc. 2020 vs. 2050 Focus The attention of the Plan is focused almost exclusively on the 2020 greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target of approximately 30% reduction from business as usual, ignoring the 80% reduction below 1990 target for 2050. Very few places in the Plan is there consideration of launching initiates that will have a small benefit by 2020 but a substantial benefit by 2050. This is a significant oversight, as it especially undervalues the slow, steady and possibly irreversible increase in emissions resulting from low density sprawl development. |
Attachment |
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-07-29 08:03:28 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.