First Name: | Walt |
---|---|
Last Name: | Seifert |
Email Address: | bikeguy@surewest.net |
Affiliation | |
Subject | Investment in urban bicycle infrastructure |
Comment |
How to invest. Funds from the cap and trade program should be invested in bicycle infrastructure in urban areas. The transportation sector is the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions in California. Using cap and trade funds to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector is a logical priority. The potential for reducing vehicle miles travelled and increasing bicycle trips is great. Bicycling rates for most California urban areas are at relatively low levels. However, the rate of trip making by bike in California, and in cities around the world, has dramatically increased when investments in bicycle infrastructure and commitments to bicycling as a form of transportation have been made. Forty percent of all trips are less than two miles, a distance that is easily bikeable by people of all ages and abilities. Those trips can be made in a time that is competitive with driving. Countless surveys have shown that the reason most people don’t bike now is fear, though many indicate they would be willing to bike if facilities like bike lanes and bike paths were available. Bicycling is the least expensive form of transportation for most trips. When all costs are considered, it is far less expensive than driving or transit. At the same time, bicycling is an effective way to increase the reach of transit, greatly expanding the size of the usual “walkshed” to transit stops or stations. Bicycling is proven and simple technology. It’s been shown to work on any scale. It doesn’t rely on an untried, speculative concept or a new product that someone is trying to sell. Supporting bicycling through infrastructure construction is low in risk and cost. The ancillary benefits of increased levels of bicycling, without the considering the reduction in greenhouse gases, are further justification for investing in bicycle infrastructure. These benefits alone justify bicycle infrastructure investment. The benefits include: improvements in public health through increased physical activity (and decreased levels of obesity and overweight) and fewer vehicle crashes, improved air quality through reduction in smog and particulates, reduced energy consumption, reduced traffic congestion and reduced noise levels. Together these would result in higher quality of life in California communities. The Rails to Trails Conservancy report Active Transportation in America http://www.railstotrails.org/resources/documents/whatwedo/atfa/ATFA_20081020.pdf, quantifies CO2 reductions, increased physical activity levels, and fuel savings. The report estimates monetary savings from three different scenarios of bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure investment nationwide. The estimated dollar savings range from $4 billion to $69 billion and don’t include savings from reductions in automobile crashes. Criteria for investment of cap and trade funds. To meet the goals of AB32 most directly, I recommend the following criteria for investment of cap and trade funds: Estimated reduction in CO2/greenhouse gas emissions Public health benefits—health improvement measured by outcomes such as estimated increased time spent in physical activity, reduction in traffic fatalities/injuries, increased longevity and health care cost savings Cost effectiveness—cost per ton of CO/2 greenhouse gas emissions reduction |
Attachment |
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2012-06-12 13:42:15 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.