First Name: | Steven |
---|---|
Last Name: | Keller |
Email Address: | sckeller@berkeley.edu |
Affiliation | UC Berkeley - School of Public Health |
Subject | Make Laws not Suggestions |
Comment |
Dear ARB: Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the Draft AB 32 Scoping Plan. I just learned of the opportunity yesterday (7/30/08). I have read through the Executive Summary and read the comments in the Transportation and Land Use areas as well. And surprisingly, by-and-large, I agree with most everyone’s comments. I wish I had time to read through the entire 294 pages of the appendices, but the comment closing date looms too close. First I’d like to thank everyone (governing bodies, agencies, businesses, and citizens) for their work on this, on AB 32, and all other Climate Change mitigation work. This is the most serious situation/problem of the modern era. These problems will take BOLD actions of governments and people alike, but the most important component is STRONG leadership of government. We can’t take baby steps, we can’t be protectionist for special interest (e.g. the Building or Auto Industries) – life itself hangs in the balance. And thus I want to say I support others in stating that our state government must take the leadership role in mandating a great many things to accomplish our goals to reduce GHG, and a host of other problems. I will be speaking here mostly on the very important subjects of Transportation and Land Use. First I’d like to show my support to other comments made on the Scoping Plan (I will be paraphrasing to save space). From the Land Use area: L. Sadler – “…land use planning is the single most important aspect...” S. Thomas – the State must “…step in to constrain local land use…make developers accountable…having strong state laws is the most equitable…” C. Pirch – “…the state should direct infrastructure dollars to projects where local government land use plans meet AB 32 targets…” L. Nock – “institute Smart Growth land use…” M. Dempsey – “…remove financial incentives to develop in agricultural areas…” K. Grimes – “…require Calif law and local land use regulations to favor low-carbon development…” C. Chase makes many good comments and arguments in both of her letters, one great statement I love and strongly support is, “…make an unequivocal commitment to State transit funding.” Additionally, T. Clark of the City of Hughson makes some very good counter arguments we should pay attention to. In the Transportation area: Here, there is one person I do have to disagree with. Mr. R. Tata suggests that we use “non-regulatory actions,” but there are many example of how those do NOT work. Volunteer programs to promote changes in business or personal practices or habits just don’t work. Take for example the Kyoto Protocol and Pres. Bush. “The 1997 Kyoto Protocol would oblige ratifying countries to reduce carbon dioxide emissions according to set schedules, to minimize potential global warming. The pact has not taken effect, however. The United States, the world's biggest carbon dioxide emitter, signed the agreement but did not ratify it, and the Bush administration has since withdrawn U.S. support, calling instead for voluntary emission reductions by U.S. industry and more scientific research into climate change.” (2005 The Associated Press) But according to a March 5, 2007, article in the Guardian UK, the US is on track to INCREASE CO2 output by 20% by 2050, so much for volunteer controls. Let me illustrate this more simply, if we didn’t have to pay taxes, who would “volunteer” to do so? The only way to achieve our lofty, but necessary goals is through laws, mandates, restrictions, controls, and voluntary action. If we need to amend CARB to close loopholes or make it work for us, we should do that. There need to be enforceable controls if we ever hope to make a difference in what we are doing to our planet. There must also be responsibility and accountability. Because, the bottom line is…all of this results in a major and serious situation…human health and well being (Public Health). Here is what Dr. Richard Jackson, Public Health and Environmental Design professor, and former Director of the CDC has to say on land use and transit. In one of his research seminar series, Dr. Jackson, stated that in 2005, California lost over a quarter of a million acres of prime farm land to development – some 300,000 acres in just one year. In the Summer 2007 issue of UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health’s, Public Health magazine Dr. Jackson says, “We need to create cities and towns that meet the planet’s demands and our pocketbook needs for efficiency; places that allow a child or someone elderly, disabled or poor to meet their life needs for safety, autonomy, transport, access to healthy food and medical care, and to culture and community. We must stop pretending that if we build endless tract houses on fine agricultural land that these human benefits will magically spring up. Better habitation helped beat infectious disease; it can help to beat chronic disease epidemic as well.” By not fully developing infill space within urban settings we are seriously wasting our available and valuable space. I don’t just mean land, but total SPACE – as well as endangering ourselves, civilization, and all life. In closing I’d just like to stress that we need to take bold and decisive action, and we need to take it now. We need strong and brave governmental leadership and laws with teeth to complete the task at hand. Let me leave you with a very old quote that still has resounding relevance today. There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old order of things, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. - Niccolo Machiavelli Lastly, here is a link to our website about bringing streetcars back to the East Bay. On the site you can find several papers and important reports that are worth taking a look at. Additionally, there are many links to local and regional organizations working with us to resolve these common issues and problems. http://www.reconnectingemeryville.com Thanx again, Steven Keller – UC Berkeley, School of Public Health John Scheuerman – Design Engineer, Siemens – Planning Commissioner, City of Emeryville |
Attachment |
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-07-31 13:33:55 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.