First Name: | Yvette |
---|---|
Last Name: | Rincon |
Email Address: | yrincon@cityofsacramento.org |
Affiliation | City of Sacramento |
Subject | City of Sacramento |
Comment |
Comments Regarding Local Government Actions and Regional Targets 1. Voluntary vs. Mandated Approach. It is unclear what ARB’s long term intent is in terms of mandatory vs. voluntary measures. In one paragraph ARB encourages local and regional governments to develop targets to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while in another paragraph ARB states that it will track and account for the local government actions to reduce GHG emissions. Will cities be required to track and report GHG emissions and later be required to meet specific State mandated GHG reductions? ABR should be clear about its intent for regulations and requirements for cities in the short and long-term. 2. Use of Incentives. ARB should employ an incentives based approach for cities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Providing funding to cities to develop regional targets would provide great incentive for cities to do so. Similar to Proposition 1C in which the State rewarded smart growth projects, ARB should grant funding to cities who develop GHG reduction targets and have a climate change plan to reach their GHG reduction targets. 3. The City generally supports tax credits, grants, and loans and other incentives to assist cities, businesses, and local agencies that invest in energy efficient equipment, technology, and programs. However, any carbon fees that ARB is considering must maximize economic benefits and minimize economic harm. That said, ARB should set aside a portion of the revenue from the carbon fees to incentivize local government by: a. Providing sustainable community grants to local governments b. Funding county-wide and city-wide greenhouse gas inventory efforts and annual reporting c. Granting funds to local jurisdictions based on their efforts to move their community towards sustainable operations 4. Distinguish between municipal targets and community targets. In general, we agree with the regional approach taken by ARB to develop regional targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, however, we would ask that ARB distinguish between municipal targets and community targets. Recognizing that cities have direct control over municipal facilities and operations and less control over the community use of energy and transit choices. |
Attachment |
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-08-01 11:55:56 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.