| First Name: | Chuck |
|---|---|
| Last Name: | Shulock |
| Email Address: | shulockconsulting@comcast.net |
| Affiliation | Shulock Consulting |
| Subject | Framework for investment of AB 32 auction proceeds |
| Comment |
This comment provides preliminary observations on the overall structure of the evaluation process, i.e. how to frame the discussion to best address the various competing priorities. In brief, it recommends that the evaluation process (at ARB and/or the Legislature): 1. Start by defining a clear, limited set of desired objectives for the use of the funds, 2. Determine the criteria that are appropriate to apply for each objective (which, notably, need not be the same across all objectives), and 3. Apply the appropriate criteria to candidate funding proposals for each objective. More detail is provided in the attachment. |
| Attachment |
www.arb.ca.gov/lists/investmentplan-ws/56-response_to_arb_request_for_public_input--shulock.docx Original File Name: Response to ARB Request for Public Input--Shulock.docx
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2012-06-21 14:10:10 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.