First Name: | Linda |
---|---|
Last Name: | Rudolph |
Email Address: | linda.rudolph@phi.org |
Affiliation | Public Health Institute |
Subject | VMT reduction, active transportation, and green space in infill development |
Comment |
We thank you for your leadership in working to meet SB32 greenhouse gas emission targets. We appreciate the multi-faceted approach in the 2030 scoping plan documents, and the opportunity to comment thereon. We are very supportive of the vision and strategies presented in both the “Vibrant Communities and Landscapes” and “Potential state-Level Strategies to Advance Sustainable, Equitable Communities and Reduce VMT” documents. We offer these few comments in addition to those submitted on behalf of a broad coalition of equity, environmental, and health organizations, to which we are signatories and strongly endorse. 1. While the documents acknowledge the importance of health co-benefits from active transport, there is no mechanism to explicitly prioritize transportation or other GHGE reduction investments based on the efficacy of strategies to generate health co-benefits (and related health care cost savings). Multiple published studies suggest that the health co-benefits of active transportation are likely to be orders of magnitude greater than those of any other strategy to reduce GHGE in the transportation sector. These health co-benefits will only be achieved if there is an explicit strategy to induce demand for mode switching from motorized to non-motorized travel. We also need to ensure that walking and bicycling is safe to prevent any increase in pedestrian/bicyclist injuries. We encourage you to consider inclusion of strategies beyond careful design of safe active transportation infrastructure, such as reduced speed limits - “twenty [mph] is plenty”. Additionally, as climate change causes rising temperatures, we need to consider infrastructure issues that make it more feasible for people to walk and bike when it is hot - such as shading and cool pavements. 2. We are concerned that the issue of green space (including trees, parks, gardens, urban agriculture, water features, and other green and natural spaces) in the context of infill development has received inadequate attention. It is very important that green space be integrated into infill development at both the project and neighborhood level, so that green space is accessible to all residents, including those who have traditionally been under-served by green spaces. Community green spaces should be prioritized over private green spaces, in order to promote equity to achieve the additional social and health benefits that these spaces provide. Rising temperatures are increasing urban heat islands and related heat illness risks. Urban greening is a key strategy to reduce the risks of urban heat islands. Green spaces buffer noise, offer shade, trap particulates and other airborne pollutants, filter groundwater, and reduce stormwater runoff. Access to nature has been associated with higher levels of outdoor physical activity, restoration from stress, a greater sense of well-being, greater social capital, and lower levels of all-cause mortality. We encourage you to identify ways to incentivize inclusion of community green space in all infill developments, to ensure the associated health benefits. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment. |
Attachment |
Original File Name:
Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2016-09-28 16:19:10 |
If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.