Comment Log Display

Here is the comment you selected to display.

Comment #8 for Public Workshop to Discuss Potential Changes to the Low Carbon Fuel Standard
(lcfs-wkshp-jul22-ws) - 1st Workshop

First Name: Michael
Last Name: Daly
Email Address: daly.lisbon@gmail.com
Affiliation
SubjectEthanol, LCFS and the climate crisis perspective from Rural Iowa
Comment

On the national television news last night there was a report about the fires near Yosemite Park.

A homeowner, a fire disaster victim, was being interviewed and it was what one would be expected in this type of an interview.  She had lived in this area home  

for more than 25 yrs. and had experienced fires before but the magnitude of this fire was unique and formidable.

Then something unexpected happened.  She looked straight into the camera and demanded that the coal industry in 

West Virginia and those who use that coal come out to Yosemite to fight the fires that burning coal is responsible for.  Her 

direct correlation of the fires, climate crisis and coal use made sense but it was the shouldering of responsibility that struck me.

That is similar to the use of ethanol in the California low carbon fuel incentive. We rural Iowa residents are now buried in corn fields and that 

in itself is not so bad but the massive fossil fuel energy it takes to grow that corn, the water pollutants that fill our waterways and flow to the delta basin, 

and the depletion of soil nutrients due to the monoculture approach to agriculture, should be bad enough to influence ethical decisions about LCF.  Now add to  

that the dynamic and destructive changes that a Hazardous High-Pressure Critical State Carbon pipeline brings into the rural area. The construction alone wipes 

 old tree growth, eliminates wildlife habitat, creates an industrial Zone replacing the rural landscape. It makes living within miles of a CO2 pipeline a 

daily gamble on you and your family's safety.  All this CO2 pipeline business is being driven, not by brilliant and ethical environmental reasoning, but by the 45Q 

tas credits and the low carbon fuel standards credits.  The ethanol plants are still producing their coal fired plant emissions and capturing a very small amount of 

their corn processing emissions to receive their "credits". The resulting energy intensive, power consuming pumping stations then transport the CO2 to where it  

is sequestered or resold as EOR(enhanced oil recovery) to produce either a cloud below the surface whose permanent storage is suspect or produce more fossil 

fuel to burn. The news coverage of the Western US fires reminds the rest of the country that we are living in a climate crisis right now.  This reminder repeats itself 

as tornados, floods, droughts and other weather phenomenon threaten the Midwest.  Now add to that the dangers of transporting the compressed carbon. 

I wonder if some night you will be watching the evening news and someone from Iowa will be interviewed about the hazardous CO2 pipeline that ruptured, 

injured and killed in a rural community.  Maybe that person will look straight into the camera and demand that the California LCFS panel come to Iowa to help 

bury the dead, help the injured and begin the clean-up of another disaster.  A man-made disaster. One that could have been avoided by better ethical 

environmental decisions.

I urge the panel to consider the costs of ethanol production. It far outweighs the decision to continue support for the fossil

fuel and the ethanol industries. A new age is upon us now. We must take bold actions in our move toward clean energy.

 

Attachment

Original File Name:

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2022-07-28 14:15:47


If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.

Board Comments Home