Comment Log Display

Comment Log Display

Below is the comment you selected to display.
Comment 280 for General Comments for the GHG Scoping Plan (sp-general-ws) - 1st Workshop.


First Name: Jim
Last Name: Wunderman
Email Address: lstraub@bayareacouncil.org
Affiliation: Bay Area Council

Subject: Bay Area Council Encourages CARB to Adopt SB 375
Comment:
August 7, 2008

Ms. Mary Nichols
Chair, California Air Resources Board
P.O. Box 2815
Sacramento, CA 95812

RE: Draft Climate Change Scoping Plan

Dear Ms. Nichols:

The Bay Area Council applauds the work the Air Resources Board has
done to date in steering the state towards meeting the goals laid
out in AB 32.  We are particularly supportive of your
recommendation for a comprehensive cap and trade program and we
hope that business can lead in the development of innovative
approaches to make this system work.

We have concerns however that that Climate Change Draft Scoping
Plan does not sufficiently address one major piece of the puzzle,
that being more efficient land use.  

As co-signators, with the Urban Land Institute (ULI), of
California 2020 Responsible Land Use: A Path to a Sustainable
California by 2020, we feel strongly that if we are to meet the
ambitious AB 32 greenhouse gas reduction targets, especially those
set for 2050, we need to immediately begin addressing the
inefficient land use patterns which have forced so many
Californians into automobiles and onto our freeways.  While The
Draft Scoping Plan lays out a clear strategy on how to reduce the
carbon impact of those drivers through cleaner fuels and  better
mass transit options  it  does little to address how we can change
those transportation patterns and reduce vehicle miles travelled
(VMT) through better, more efficient land use.

We have also been working with Senator Darrell Steinberg for over
two years on ensuring that California 2020 principles are
incorporated in SB 375 and we are very pleased that the cities,
the environmental community and the home builders have now reached
agreement on how to develop California in a smart and sustainable
manner going forward.

We have developed a horizontal suburban state with large housing
subdivisions linked by large freeways to distant job centers and
services traversed by people in large SUVs.  We feel that while it
is important to address that large SUV and its emissions, it is
equally, if not more important to address the land use patterns
that are at the core of this problem.  As our overall VMT grows,
new technology will not be able to keep pace with the emissions
produced by all those additional miles travelled.  We need to get
people out of their cars and if they do have to drive we need to
reduce the length of those trips.  This can only be achieved by
developing a regional planning focus and altering our land use
behavior.


A study in the Bay Area by the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission found that for people who both live and work within
half a mile of a rail or ferry stop, 42 percent of them commute by
transit. For those who neither work nor live within such proximity,
the number falls to 4 percent. Elsewhere, individuals living in
higher-density neighborhoods that include convenient access to
transit, as well as pedestrian and bicycle-friendly features,
reduce their driving by 15 to 50 percent. 

We need to incentivize and facilitate Transit Oriented
Development, as well as remove barriers and impediments to urban
infill development where homes are built close to retail, services
and jobs. We need to develop a plan that will reduce VMT by
building dense multi-family housing closer to services and jobs,
and we need to focus on getting people out of cars.

We would like to suggest that the Bay Area region be put forward
for a regional pilot program on how best to reduce VMT through
better land use and more efficient transit alternatives.  The Bay
Area is the ideal place for such a program since we have an
abundance of urban infill and TOD opportunities and the political
and popular will is here to see the necessary changes made in
order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

It can take decades to effect meaningful land use changes
therefore we encourage you to adopt the policies laid out in
California 2020 and SB 375 and address this issue as soon as
possible. We look forward to working with you to make California a
cleaner healthier place for all its citizens.  The official letter
is attached.

Sincerely,


 

Jim Wunderman
President & CEO
Bay Area Council

Cc:  Members, California Air Resources Board
Metropolitan transportation Commission
Association of Bay Area Governments
Bay Conservation and Development Commission

Attachment: www.arb.ca.gov/lists/sp-general-ws/512-carb_letter__3_.doc

Original File Name: CARB letter (3).doc

Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-08-11 12:08:40



If you have any questions or comments please contact Office of the Ombudsman at (916) 327-1266.


Board Comments Home

preload